<$BlogRSDUrl$> <body style="background-color: #FEFCF1"><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d6395693\x26blogName\x3dmordant+wit\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dTAN\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttps://mordantwit.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den_US\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://mordantwit.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d-11873617807163903', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>
Google
 
Web mordantwit.blogspot.com

March 31, 2004

 

Condi to testify 


The Bush administration: Strong on national defense, fucking pussies when it comes to Senate hearings. Now they tell us Condi will testify under oath to the 9/11 commission. Well, that was easy. Here I was thinking we were dealing with an administration that really believed in the Constitution! Indeed, 'White House has maintained that a member of the president's staff can't appear before a congressionally chartered commission without violating the Constitution's separation of powers.' And Scott McClellan has been steadfast in his conviction that, well, it's the principle of the thing:

March 9: 'Again, this is not her personal preference; this goes back to a matter of principle. There is a separation of powers issue involved here. Historically, White House staffers do not testify before legislative bodies. So it's a matter of principle, not a matter of preference.' [WhiteHouse.gov]

March 17: 'I think this has been previously addressed. It's not a matter of personal preference. You have to look at it as a matter of principle and a separation of powers issue.' [WhiteHouse.gov]

March 22: 'Again, it's not something that's a matter of personal preference. It's a matter of separation of powers. It's a matter of principle.' [WhiteHouse.gov]

March 23: 'There's a principle involved here regarding separation of powers. And I think we previously addressed that, and we've addressed that from the get-go when it comes to this issue. It's not a matter of Dr. Rice's personal preference. It's a matter of principle.' [WhiteHouse.gov]

And you know why they didn't want to fuck with the Constitution, right? Well, they were saving it for marriage.



 
 
Comments: Post a Comment

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?